Metacommentary: Does anyone honestly care?

I don't use too much metacommentary. I primarily stated the opinion of Stoll and Ohman, without too much of my own stuff to say. I suppose I could state that I disagree with what they have to say to some extent, though I find their arguments valid. Perhaps in order to revise it, I could mention more so that I find Stoll's and Ohman's points intriguing, yet I think they see the problem too much in a black-and-white sense.